A service of

Venture backers re-up for late-stage rounds

  • Ownership opportunities become increasingly scarce
  • Goal to preserve ownership stakes and board control
  • Raising within 18 months of a potential liquidity event

Venture investors are choosing to lead large late-stage financing rounds for their companies rather than open them to new capital.

The effort is aimed at preserving ownership stakes and board control in their strongest portfolio companies. As companies stay private longer and valuations climb, late-stage ownership opportunities have become harder to find, and the ability to hold a position is now nearly as strategically important as establishing one.

Capital is pooling into a shrinking set of businesses. The five largest venture deals accounted for 77.6% of all new unicorn investment in the first quarter of 2026, according to PitchBook, and recent mega-rounds have increasingly been led by long-tenured backers.

Databricks’ financing last month, which valued the company at USD 188bn, a 40% increase over the USD 134bn it reached in February, was led by existing investor Coatue as the company continued to delay a public listing.

At legal technology company Harvey, Sequoia co-led a USD 200m round at an USD 11bn valuation in March, its third time leading a Harvey financing since the company’s Series A, after the valuation rose more than 3.5 times in a year.

Western Alliance’s Innovation Banking Group has multiple late-stage portfolio companies currently raising insider-led rounds at increased valuations, said Mike Lederman, who leads the group. The rounds are designed to preserve existing shareholders’ board oversight, he said.

“They’re raising very sizable inside rounds at increased valuations, really to preserve their ownership, preserve their control in terms of board oversight,” Lederman said.

Some of the companies raising these rounds are within 18 months of a potential liquidity event, Lederman said. The current financing could be the last equity round before a listing or sale.

For management teams, the appeal is avoiding a broader fundraising process, Lederman said. Companies keep the same investor syndicate and board.

“I don’t need to go out and pitch this 20 times and spend time thinking about who I want on the cap table,” Lederman said.

For venture investors, the rounds provide a home for capital they are struggling to deploy elsewhere, Lederman said.

“If they’ve got what they perceive as a winner, there’s kind of reason to double down.”

For late-stage investors, the universe of truly exceptional late-stage opportunities has become increasingly concentrated, said Natalie Hwang, founding managing partner of Apeira Capital and an investor in Cerebras Systems and SpaceX.

“The value of maintaining ownership through a company’s later development stages has increased,” Hwang said. “It’s natural that existing investors, who know the business well and have spent years underwriting its long-term potential, would want to continue participating.”

Existing investors appear to be taking up a growing share of late-stage rounds, Hwang said. This concentrates capital around a relatively small portfolio of category-defining businesses.

“For us, the goal has never been to participate broadly across the late-stage market,” Hwang said. “We’re looking for a relatively concentrated number of category-defining businesses operating in strategically important sectors where we believe long-term value creation remains compelling.”

AI ties

This phenomenon is most visible in later-stage, AI-enabled businesses, where investor demand is intense and allocation is hard to secure, said David Koch, managing partner at Koch Capital Advisory.

Wider direct access to private companies has reduced reliance on traditional placement routes, Koch said, and liquidity and regulation have opened private markets to a broader base of investors. The US Securities and Exchange Commission has prioritized enhancing retail exposure to private markets in proposals for its 2026 regulatory agenda.

The result is a widening gap between crowded AI names and everything else, Koch said, where capital is harder to attract.

Within the capital structure itself, investors in AI businesses are increasingly customers of the companies they back, complicating efforts to value them, said Bob Curley, Western Alliance’s deputy chief banking officer.

“It is a little bit of a complicated capital stack where investors are your customers and it’s circular,” Curley said. “That obfuscates what the true underlying value is.”

Curley attributes the phenomenon to the buildout of AI infrastructure, where large sums are being raised from a handful of companies to address compute and power shortages. He said conditions will likely normalize once that infrastructure is in place, drawing a comparison to semiconductor fabrication.

He pushed back on the idea that the AI market is a bubble. A company may see a 15% decline, for example, but that might come after its valuation had already increased 400%, Curley said.

For the rest of the year, the scarcity of access to the strongest late-stage companies is adding to the appeal for existing backers to hold on.

“The asymmetry of access is only increasing within the late-stage market,” Hwang said. “That dynamic naturally encourages existing investors with long-term conviction to continue supporting their strongest portfolio companies.”